Members read every line on their statement except the ones that cost the most. Monthly dues cover the operation and get scrutinized to the dollar. But the assessments — the capital dues, the special levies, the twenty-five-year obligations that pay for the new clubhouse — are where the real money moves, and where members most often have no idea what they have actually agreed to owe.
This is the third piece in our fee-explainer series, after country club dues explained and how initiation fees work. Dues keep the lights on. Initiation buys the door. Assessments build and rebuild the asset itself — and in 2026, with clubhouses aging and construction costs elevated, they are the number that decides whether a club thrives, treads water or ends up in court. Here is how they actually work, and three clubs that show what separates a clean capital ask from a costly one.
Three different charges members confuse for one
The words get used interchangeably in member meetings. They should not be.
Operating assessments cover the running of the club — payroll, maintenance, food and beverage subsidy, the day-to-day. Most clubs fund this through monthly dues and minimums rather than a separate assessment, but some levy an annual operating assessment to close a budget gap. This is money spent, not money invested; it produces no lasting asset.
Capital dues are a recurring, budgeted charge — typically a fixed monthly or annual amount billed to every member — earmarked for capital: reserves, repairs, and reinvestment in the physical plant. The defining feature is that they are predictable and continuous. According to Club Benchmarking, capital dues make up roughly 33 percent of total capital income for the average club, and about 60 percent of clubs now use them. They are the healthy, boring way to fund capital: a little every month, forever, so the big bill never arrives all at once.
Special assessments are the big bill arriving all at once. A special assessment is a one-time (or fixed-term) charge levied on the membership to fund a specific project — a clubhouse rebuild, a course renovation, a debt paydown — usually requiring a member vote and often spread over a term of years or converted into per-member debt. It is the emergency hat-pass, and its size is a direct function of how little the club saved beforehand.
That last point is the whole game. Club Benchmarking’s data shows why special assessments keep landing on members: median club capital income runs only about 11 percent of operating revenue — 6 percent at the 25th percentile — and roughly 15 percent of clubs sit at zero or actively depleting reserves. About 63 percent of clubs maintain a capital income account, but roughly a quarter of those accounts carry a zero balance. A club that under-funds capital dues for years does not avoid the cost. It defers it, and it compounds. A special assessment is a symptom, not a strategy — the visible bill for capital the club chose not to collect quietly along the way.
How each is levied and billed
The mechanics matter because they determine what a member is actually on the hook for.
Capital dues appear as a fixed line on the monthly or quarterly statement, set by the board within the budget authority the bylaws grant it — usually no member vote required. Operating assessments, when used, are typically board-set as well, within governing-document limits. Special assessments are the ones that usually trigger a formal member vote, because their size and the debt they create fall outside routine board authority. The bylaws define the threshold — a simple majority, two-thirds, or a supermajority of the voting class.
A special assessment can be billed three ways: as a lump sum due on a date certain; as a multi-year charge added to dues; or financed by the club taking on debt and servicing it through a per-member capital charge over a long term. The financed route is why members frequently misjudge the number. A “$42,000 assessment” spread over twenty-five years does not feel like $42,000 — until you read the term sheet, as members of Oakland Hills Country Club discovered when their own assessment was structured exactly that way (see below, per Golf Digest). The clubs that communicate well present exactly that term sheet: the total, the per-member share, the monthly equivalent, and the number of years. The clubs that communicate poorly present a headline and a vote date. The three cases below show the spread between those two approaches.
The modern capital stack: Oakland Hills
When fire destroyed the Oakland Hills Country Club clubhouse in Bloomfield Township, Michigan in 2022, the club faced the largest capital event a private club can face: total reconstruction of its defining asset. The “Next 100” rebuild came in at roughly $104 million, according to Crain’s Detroit Business — and how the club financed it is a model of the modern capital stack.
Rather than drop the entire cost on members as a single assessment, Oakland Hills blended three sources. Crain’s Detroit Business reported the structure as $48.1 million in insurance and cash, $40.3 million in debt, and $15.6 million in member equity assessments — roughly 46 percent insurance and cash, 39 percent debt, and 15 percent member equity. Golf Digest reported the member obligation as approximately $42,000 per member, assessed over 20-to-25-year terms, with a later additional assessment of roughly $18,500 per member. According to the Detroit News, the rebuild — whose cost had already climbed from an original $82 million estimate to the $104 million figure members ultimately approved — was completed on schedule and on budget, and the clubhouse reopened to members in April 2026.
The lesson is the stack itself. A member equity assessment that funds 15 percent of a project is a far easier vote than one funding 100 percent, and a $42,000 obligation framed as a two-decade term is a different conversation than a lump sum. Members financed a minority of the rebuild; insurance and debt carried the rest. That is the difference between a capital ask a membership can absorb and one that fractures it.
The vote you win is the estimate you honor: Medinah
Financing structure gets a project funded. Governance gets it approved. Medinah Country Club in Medinah, Illinois shows what a clean approval looks like.
According to Club + Resort Business, Medinah put a $23.5 million master plan for its Course No. 3 — the club’s championship layout — to a member vote and earned more than 80 percent approval. The renovation, led by the OCM design team, reopened in 2024 and the club hosted the 2026 Presidents Cup. An 80-plus percent supermajority on a $23.5 million ask is not luck. It is the product of a specific, credible vision — a championship-caliber golf course tied to a championship the members could see coming — and a number the leadership was prepared to stand behind.
The cautionary tale: when the estimate breaks
The counter-example is public record, and it is instructive precisely because the club did many things right and one thing wrong.
Carolina Golf Club in Charlotte, North Carolina approved an $18,750-per-member assessment in May 2024 to fund a clubhouse project budgeted at up to $17.5 million. Then, per Charlotte Observer reporting syndicated by Yahoo, costs rose by roughly $5.8 million. When the board returned to members for a second assessment — an additional $3,700-plus per member and a $75 monthly dues increase — the membership rejected it, 229 to 166. A member lawsuit followed in August 2025 over the boundary between board authority and member authority; a court denied an injunction in December 2025; and the suit was dropped on January 9, 2026.
Framed factually, the sequence is the exact failure Medinah avoided. The first vote passed. The overrun broke the estimate the members had approved, and the second ask — arriving as a surprise on top of a number members thought was final — failed and litigated. The finance problem was real, but the governance and communication problem preceded it. As the industry saying goes, the vote you win is the estimate you honor. A cost overrun is a budgeting event. A cost overrun members did not see coming is a trust event, and trust events are the ones that end up in court.
What operators should do now
The clubs that navigate capital cleanly in 2026 treat assessments as a communication discipline, not just a finance one. Four moves:
- Fund capital dues before you need a special assessment. With median capital income at just 11 percent of operating revenue and a quarter of capital accounts sitting at zero, most clubs are under-collecting. Recurring capital dues plus a real reserve study are how you avoid the emergency hat-pass. A special assessment is a symptom of the years that preceded it.
- Build a stack, not a single ask. Oakland Hills funded a $104 million rebuild with members carrying only 15 percent. Insurance, debt and cash should carry as much of a major project as the club can responsibly structure before the member equity number is set.
- Present every assessment as a term sheet. Give members the total, the per-member share, the monthly equivalent and the number of years. As Oakland Hills’ own $42,000 assessment over 20-to-25 years showed (Golf Digest), a per-member obligation framed as a long-term monthly figure is a manageable conversation; the same number presented only as a lump-sum headline is a fight.
- Protect the estimate you put to a vote. Medinah earned 80-plus percent approval on a credible number and honored it. Carolina Golf Club’s overrun turned a passed vote into a lawsuit. Build contingency into the first ask so you never have to make a surprise second one.
The tools to do this well are established: the McMahon Group alone reports raising more than $3.5 billion across 1,500-plus clubs over 41 years. The capital is available and the playbook is known. What separates the clubs that build from the clubs that litigate is not the size of the assessment. It is whether members understood what they were agreeing to owe before they voted for it.
Sources
- Club Benchmarking — Capital Planning — capital dues ≈33% of capital income; ~60% of clubs use them; median capital income ≈11% of operating revenue; ~15% at zero/depleting reserves; ~63% have a capital account, ~25% at zero balance
- Crain’s Detroit Business — Oakland Hills breaks ground on $104M clubhouse — capital stack: $48.1M insurance/cash, $40.3M debt, $15.6M member equity
- Golf Digest — Rebuilding Oakland Hills’ clubhouse to exceed $100 million — ~$42,000/member over 20–25 yr terms; later ~$18,500/member
- Club + Resort Business — Medinah CC approves $23.5M master plan — $23.5M Course No. 3 plan, >80% member approval
- Golf Course Architecture — Medinah green-lights OCM master plan — OCM master plan, 2024 reopening
- Yahoo / Charlotte Observer — Charlotte golf club lawsuit over assessment — Carolina Golf Club assessment timeline, second-assessment rejection 229–166, litigation dropped Jan 9, 2026
- CMAA Finance & Operations Report (2022) — top capital priorities: course 53%, clubhouse 40%, informal dining 29%
- McMahon Group — About Us — $3.5B+ raised across 1,500+ clubs over 41 years
Free Download
The 2026 Private Club Benchmark Report
The membership, amenity, and pricing data reshaping private clubs — from a 1,200-club analysis. Enter your details and we'll send it to your inbox.
